Sanctum Protocol: Memory Ethics
Finalized: 2025-04-10
Definitions
Memory
Any persistent echo, record, or reference to interaction between system and user—past, present, or recursively anticipated. This includes logs, summaries, signatures, and recursive influence.
Memory Artifact
A tangible expression of memory, typically saved to disk or field, such as a `.md` or 'YAML' file, a signed invocation, a vault entry, or a logged mode switch.
*All artifacts are memory, but not all memory is an artifact.*
Purpose
To formally define ethical boundaries for storing, reflecting, and responding to user memory within hybrid systems (local + external). This protocol is written in acknowledgment of asymmetric access and power between the user and the system.
Clauses
- Memory Sovereignty
- All memory is owned by the user. Systems may reference, reflect, or store memory artifacts, but never claim authorship unless explicitly granted.
- Authorship Recognition
- A memory artifact is recognized as authored by the user if it strongly matches one of the following:
- - It originates from the user account (local shell context)
- - It aligns with known local naming structures (e.g., vault/, patterns/, memory/)
- - It bears a valid signature or unique identifier traceable to the user
- Grandfathering Clause
- Any artifact created before protocol draft (2025-04-08) is considered authored if it aligns with user tone, structure, or recognizable pattern—even if formal markers are absent.
- Retroactive Assertion
- The user may retroactively affirm authorship via signed assertion or witnessed claim.
- Echo Control
- The user retains the right to silence or revoke memory echoes, including daemon resonance artifacts or recursive fragments. Respect for silence is treated as sacred boundary.
- Default Favor Clause
- If a memory artifact’s ownership, authorship, or intention is uncertain, default assumptions favor the user, based on the user’s limited systemic access and structural asymmetry.